<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taylor Mali is a Rock Star Poet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rockstarpoet.ca/taylor-mali-is-a-rock-star-poet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rockstarpoet.ca/taylor-mali-is-a-rock-star-poet/</link>
	<description>Good poets should be treated like rock stars; this blog is the first step.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:35:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Snider</title>
		<link>http://rockstarpoet.ca/taylor-mali-is-a-rock-star-poet/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Snider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockstarpoet.ca/?p=1#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Gerry, I definitely understand your point, and I actually do share some of your concern. I suppose, to some extent, the &quot;rock star poet&quot; term is a bit of shorthand to explain a bigger concept.

That said, I would argue that you&#039;re confusing &quot;rock star&quot; with &quot;pop star,&quot; at least when you say that very few rock stars write their own material. I&#039;d say that pop stars---and I&#039;m talking about pop as a genre (Britney Spears, et al), rather than simply popular music---tend to be talented performers who let others write their music for them.

Rock stars, I&#039;d argue, are more likely to write their own material (whether or not that material is worth the attention it gets is another issue).

Further to all of this, I don&#039;t think that commercial viability and artistic worth are mutually exclusive---at least, they shouldn&#039;t have to be.

Anyway, thanks for commenting. I&#039;m planning a post about this whole concept of the rock star poet for the not-too-distant future, so I hope you&#039;ll check back and let me know what you think after I&#039;ve provided a more in-depth explanation of what I&#039;m trying to get at with this blog. You may still feel that same at that point, but that&#039;s fine. I welcome differing opinions, and I&#039;d love to hear from you in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gerry, I definitely understand your point, and I actually do share some of your concern. I suppose, to some extent, the &#8220;rock star poet&#8221; term is a bit of shorthand to explain a bigger concept.</p>
<p>That said, I would argue that you&#8217;re confusing &#8220;rock star&#8221; with &#8220;pop star,&#8221; at least when you say that very few rock stars write their own material. I&#8217;d say that pop stars&#8212;and I&#8217;m talking about pop as a genre (Britney Spears, et al), rather than simply popular music&#8212;tend to be talented performers who let others write their music for them.</p>
<p>Rock stars, I&#8217;d argue, are more likely to write their own material (whether or not that material is worth the attention it gets is another issue).</p>
<p>Further to all of this, I don&#8217;t think that commercial viability and artistic worth are mutually exclusive&#8212;at least, they shouldn&#8217;t have to be.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for commenting. I&#8217;m planning a post about this whole concept of the rock star poet for the not-too-distant future, so I hope you&#8217;ll check back and let me know what you think after I&#8217;ve provided a more in-depth explanation of what I&#8217;m trying to get at with this blog. You may still feel that same at that point, but that&#8217;s fine. I welcome differing opinions, and I&#8217;d love to hear from you in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry</title>
		<link>http://rockstarpoet.ca/taylor-mali-is-a-rock-star-poet/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rockstarpoet.ca/?p=1#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Colluding the two terms &#039;Rock Star&#039; and &#039;Poet&#039; is doing more harm than good. &#039;Rock Star&#039; is a term that has come to denote an artist that is appraised for commercial ability rather than praiseworthy insight into the human condition. Further consider that very few &#039;Rock Stars&#039; in the current application of the term compose their own material. This is not to say that populism should be shunned, or that obscurity is the hallmark of a more insightful artist. Simply, &#039;Rock Star&#039; is a very poor term to describe any artist. The term is too engaged with excess and celebrity to offer anything constructive when used to describe an artist&#039;s output.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colluding the two terms &#8216;Rock Star&#8217; and &#8216;Poet&#8217; is doing more harm than good. &#8216;Rock Star&#8217; is a term that has come to denote an artist that is appraised for commercial ability rather than praiseworthy insight into the human condition. Further consider that very few &#8216;Rock Stars&#8217; in the current application of the term compose their own material. This is not to say that populism should be shunned, or that obscurity is the hallmark of a more insightful artist. Simply, &#8216;Rock Star&#8217; is a very poor term to describe any artist. The term is too engaged with excess and celebrity to offer anything constructive when used to describe an artist&#8217;s output.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
